Billion secs = 32 yrs, Trillion secs = 32,000 yrs


Visit USADebtClock.com to learn more!

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Admiral: Benghazi was October surprise that backfired!

The last paragraph begins with “The Republicans have missed opportunities”. That should tell you all you need to know about how this nation has gone to hell.

The ‘missed opportunities’ are purposeful because the leaders of the republicans follow the same orders as the leaders of the democrats. There is no two party system in America. It’s all an illusion created by the ‘rulers of this world’ to make us think we have freedom while they construct the ‘new world order’. They own both sides!

Who are they? The Luciferian Rothschild/Rockefeller bankster cabal. They are behind the Illuminati, the Bilderbergers, the UN, the CFR, the TLC, the multitude of ‘foundations, the major corporations, etc. They own the media, academia, Hollywood, the courts, including the Supreme Court, and of course, the political parties… 

Retired 4 star Admiral Blows Whistle on Benghazi new Evidence

Posted on 26 April, 2013 by Amy

550x412xUS-Ambassador-to-Libya-being-carried-through-streets-110912_jpg_pagespeed_ic_vB6Kg0vekr

Ambassador Stevens carried through the streets of Benghazi for 5 hours while US media alleged he was being helped to the hospital? More Obama White House lies!
By Doc Vega

A lot has been said and written, but this promises to break the case wide open!

There have been many theories and accusations about the Benghazi fiasco that not only cost Ambassador J. Christian Stevens his life, but the lives of his staff and one Navy Seal body-guard as well. This action which led to a complete conflagration of terrorist attacks against US diplomatic buildings throughout the Middle East and North Africa still remains largely uninvestigated by the government, unprosecuted by AG Eric Holder’s Depart of Justice, and refuses to bring the guilty parties to justice while many know the truth and are not coming forward. Even though President Obama is implicated in this oversees tragedy still the truth has not emerged.

That has all changed. Finally, an authoritative figure with the proper credentials has stepped up to the plate to tell the true story of what did happen without the lies and cover-ups that have so far kept those guilty of murder from standing trial. The admission on the part of this man will likely blow the Benghazi scandal wide open and lead to arrests if we can get our legal system to act as it should. That, however, is a big if.

Related: Read Letter: Special Ops Vets Demand Benghazi Congressional Investigation

The story as it truly unfolded

According to a report from the Washington Times, retired 4 Star Admiral James Lyons reveals the entire plot that led to the deaths of Americans in Libya that could have been prevented, who gave the orders, and why events took place as they tragically did. Admiral James Lyons is probably the highest ranking figure ever to intervene in a federal government criminal case, and testify. Thanks to this man’s dedication to his country and the truth, we will finally know the truth and who was responsible.

In his words Lyons says that the attack on Benghazi was a bungled kidnapping attempt to be perpetrated upon Ambassador Stevens. This was to appear to be a hostage exchange for a terrorist prisoner who was to be released in trade for a supposedly captured US ambassador. The trade would have been for Omar Abdel Rahman an international prisoner, known as the Blind Sheikh.

This apparent abduction by terrorists of our ambassador and then negotiated trade for the Blind Sheikh would have been the “October Surprise” that would have elevated President Obama’s flagging popularity and boosted his approval ratings for a re-election. A dramatic prisoner exchange that saved our ambassador’s life However, something went horribly wrong. A cunning and illegal bit of treachery by the Obama White House turned into something entirely different. Obama’s October surprise turned into a carnage orchestrated by the White House itself as the President, Leon Panetta, and CIA Director, David Petraeus watched via a UAV real-time feed as a 7 hour attack on the Benghazi Embassy raged. Reportedly, stand down orders were given several times to different units within striking distance.

A plot of pure deception

With what should have been only a staged kidnapping of Ambassador J. Christian Stevens, instead, Navy Seals Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty refused a stand down order and began doing their job of protecting the ambassador using force. Immediately the well-trained Seals began inflicting heavy casualties upon the terrorists who thought they were merely in a cake walk to abduct Ambassador Stevens without mishap. As a result of the plan going awry, a massive attack arose from the anger of the terrorists who felt they had been betrayed by President Obama. In the aftermath of the battle which saw Navy Seal Glen Doherty was killed after the embassy had been overrun along with the ambassador’s staff. Ambassador Steven’s whose body showed up 5 hours later at a Benghazi hospital supposedly overcome by smoke as the initial press reports indicated was, in fact, raped, tortured, and dragged around Benghazi in retaliation for the botched Obama White House plan.

Obama hands over Libya to Al Qaeda

Was this just a freak occurrence that belies the true nature of dealings in Libya with American diplomatic efforts, just one glitch in normal standard operating procedure? No, according to former Admiral Lyons and many others such as Glen Beck, who have all uncovered evidence that lead to much more sinister deeds being undertaken. Evidence of a working relationship between the US and its alleged terrorist enemies had already delivered Libya to the Al Qaeda terrorist organization through infiltration of the government, media, and general society prior to the rebellion against Muammar Gaddafi that toppled the dictator last year. That the US has worked with Al Qaeda awarding them security contracts for all US embassies and consulates as well as border protection has instead allowed Libya to become a haven for numerous terrorist operators who have automatic access to Libya’s territory to carry out their training. All this with the support and blessing of the Obama administration. This is not only unthinkable, but beyond excuse or rationalization. There should already be indictments for many in the state department, in the DOJ, all the way up to the oval office, yet, so far nothing has been done.

Treason plain and simple

It goes even farther than that. Evidence indicates that Ambassador Stevens was being used as an arms dealer to supply Jihadists in the region to support yet another uprising in Syria. Just prior to the murder of our ambassador, he was trying to locate guns that had been walked across Libya’s border to other countries just as the ATF had done in operation Fast and Furious on the border of Mexico. These are not the actions of inexperience or bad intelligence. They are the actions of traitorous intention. President Obama will, no doubt, be linked to these deaths and operations if Congress will only act, and do its duty in prosecuting a treasonous president who is endangering national security.

There is no where else for a Congressional investigation to turn other than naming the conspirators, determining when officials knew, and assembling the evidence that murder was committed on behalf of the White House to silence those who knew and could testify. Through out the Obama presidency over the last four years the administration has master minded operations that have caused numerous controversies and crises.

When will the GOP take action?

The Republicans have missed opportunities to discredit the President, to impeach Obama in the wake of waging war against Libya without Congressional approval, and allowed executive privilege to quash subpoenaed demands for evidence on Fast and Furious never released by AG Eric Holder. John Boehner, Speaker of the House, has refused to exercise initiative whenever the GOP could have used much-needed momentum to stem the tide against the incessant assaults against state’s rights, constitutional rights, and the traditional institutions of America. Will the recent damning evidence now uncovered over the Benghazi fiasco thanks to Admiral James Lyons be implemented to convict the President of potential high treason, or will we see yet another case of criminal acts ignored and hidden at the expense of the American people? If you bother to take interest and act as a responsible citizens contact your congressman and demand action!

Read more at http://www.politisite.com/2013/01/17/retired-4-star-admiral-blows-whistle-on-benghazi-new-evidence/#.UXmEarWG1qU

Monday, April 29, 2013

Kissinger, Paulson arrive in Bejing seeking to further strengthen ties

Are these two Rothschild agents there getting or receiving orders?

Xi meets former US heavyweights

By WU JIAO and PU ZHENDONG ( China Daily)

Kissinger, Paulson arrive in Bejing seeking to further strengthen ties

Cabinet members, governors and top military officers are among the guests from the United States who have met with President Xi Jinping just weeks after he was elected China's top leader.

The guest list got longer on Wednesday, with the addition of two former US politicians who are now heavyweight think-tank figures — Henry Kissinger and Henry Paulson.

Xi meets former US heavyweights

Former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger, in Beijing on Wednesday, ahead of his 90th birthday next month. Sheng Jiapeng for China Daily

Analysts said the world's two largest economies are engaged in unprecedented frequent communication to keep bilateral ties smooth and to avoid misunderstandings after each has just concluded their leadership transitions.

Kissinger, the former US national security adviser and secretary of state who is known as the architect of China-US relations with his secret visit to China in 1971, is no stranger to Xi. The two met several times before Xi became president in March. In the meeting on Wednesday, Xi wished the veteran diplomat a happy birthday in advance of his 90th birthday next month, and also wished him "good health and longevity".

Facing a guest who is a highly respected foreign policy analyst in the US, Xi said China and the US should further expand their high-level exchanges and dialogue, identify shared interests and properly handle disputes.

China and the US should "continue coordination on global and regional affairs, and maintain a long-term stable development of bilateral ties", Xi said.

Long-time friend

Kissinger, who has visited China more than 80 times and devoted more than four decades to preserving China-US ties, said "US-China cooperation is vital not only to the two countries, but also to the world".

The two countries should deepen communication and expand cooperation on key issues of peace and stability, which is conducive to the world's stable development, Kissinger said.

Jin Canrong, a professor on US studies at Renmin University of China, said Kissinger has been on the guest list of successive generations of Chinese leaders because he has made a significant contribution to the development of Sino-US relations. "Kissinger still plays an active role in Washington policymaking by providing important counsel to the government. He has broad social influence," Jin said.

Xi said Kissinger has exerted a positive influence over China-US ties during the administrations of eight US presidents, and has played special and significant roles in some cases.

Paulson, the former US treasury secretary, told Xi in another meeting that the two countries can cooperate more in the energy and economy sectors.

Since Xi became the top Party leader in November, he also has met successively with two US Cabinet members — Secretary of State John Kerry and Treasury Secretary Jack Lew — plus US governors and former US president Jimmy Carter.

Analysts said that frequent high-level exchanges between Beijing and Washington during the early months of both countries' new administrations will help reaffirm the importance of the relationship and set up a framework of bilateral ties under the new leaderships.

Li Haidong, a specialist in China-US ties at China Foreign Affairs University, said that regular communication between the two countries helps to dispel suspicion and misjudgment on both sides.

The frequent visits US officials of all levels are making to Beijing at least shows that the US is seriously considering the future direction of bilateral ties, and that should be welcomed, Jin said.

Jin said there is great potential to continue improving bilateral ties, since the second administration of US President Barack Obama hasn't established a fixed China policy and China has already posed the concept of "a new type of relationship between big countries".

“Flush it”: abortion clinic worker to question “What if it pops out at home?”.

UPDATE: Anti-abortion group releases videos of clinic workers discussing live births...

RINO or Rothschild agent?

Much credit is given hurricane Sandy in the reelection of Barak Hussein Obama, makes one wonder! Obama rushed to the cameras to promise help in the hurricane’s aftermath, he had a walk with Gov. Christie in which Christie went out of his way to praise and thank Obama.

Obama was hailed as very presidential in his handling of the natural disaster over and over on TV news and entertainment shows and in the print media and much of the coverage was of Christie’s sucking up to him.

I don’t know this, but it sure makes me suspicious of the HAARP program and one of it’s reputed uses; the ability to control weather. Was HAARP fired up in order to generate a natural disaster for Obama’s benefit? 

Christie continues to praise Obama even though thousands are still homeless and looters are raiding homes under repair!

If you read the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion you’ll understand what a RINO is and what a Rothschild agent is. They can be the same or different. A republican who actually believes some of the liberal bs would be a RINO but not necessarily a Rothschild agent.

A Rothschild agent/RINO is like an undercover cop or a spy with this caveat, his mission is to infiltrate, not primarily to gather information, but to move and shape policies in the direction the Luciferian Rothschild/Rockefeller bankster cabal dictates.

In Chris Christie’s case, my vote is for Rothschild agent!

OBAMA 'KEPT EVERY PROMISE'

6 Months After Sandy, Thousands Still Homeless...
Looters STILL Raiding Homes Under Repair...
'Where are the politicians now?'

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Poll: Americans fear government more than terror

I must say this is somewhat encouraging. If we could only figure out a way to come together and mobilize maybe we could stop the headlong plunge into the bottomless pit of the new world order.

There is no room for a free America in the new world order, that is why we have a government at war with ‘We the People’!.

DHS was not created to protect the people of the homeland but to protect the government from the people of the homeland!

Astonishing poll results for 1st time since 9/11 hijackings

Drew Zahn

police_raid

According to a pair of recent polls, for the first time since the 9/11 terrorist hijackings, Americans are more fearful their government will abuse constitutional liberties than fail to keep its citizens safe.

Even in the wake of the April 15 Boston Marathon bombing – in which a pair of Islamic radicals are accused of planting explosives that took the lives of 3 and wounded over 280 – the polls suggest Americans are hesitant to give up any further freedoms in exchange for increased “security.”

A Fox News survey polling a random national sample of 619 registered voters the day after the bombing found despite the tragic event, those interviewed responded very differently than following 9/11.

For the first time since a similar question was asked in May 2001, more Americans answered “no” to the question, “Would you be willing to give up some of your personal freedom in order to reduce the threat of terrorism?”

Of those surveyed on April 16, 2013, 45 percent answered no to the question, compared to 43 percent answering yes.

In May 2001, before 9/11, the balance was similar, with 40 percent answering no to 33 percent answering yes.

But following the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the numbers flipped dramatically, to 71 percent agreeing to sacrifice personal freedom to reduce the threat of terrorism.

Subsequent polls asking the same question in 2002, 2005 and 2006 found Americans consistently willing to give up freedom in exchange for security. Yet the numbers were declining from 71 percent following 9/11 to only 54 percent by May 2006.

Now, it would seem, the famous quote widely attributed to Benjamin Franklin – “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety” – is holding more sway with Americans than it has in over a dozen years.

A similar poll sampling 588 adults, conducted on April 17 and 18 for the Washington Post, also discovered the change in attitude.

“Which worries you more,” the Post asked, “that the government will not go far enough to investigate terrorism because of concerns about constitutional rights, or that it will go too far in compromising constitutional rights in order to investigate terrorism?”

The poll found 48 percent of respondents worry the government will go too far, compared to 41 percent who worry it won’t go far enough.

And similar to the Fox News poll, the Post found the worry to be a fresh development, as only 44 percent worried the government would go too far in January 2006 and only 27 percent worried the government would go too far in January 2010.

The Fox News poll was unique in that it further broke the responses down by political affiliation:

  • Bucking the trend, 51 percent of Democrats responded they would give up personal freedom to reduce the threat of terror, compared to 36 percent opposed.
  • Forty-seven percent of Republicans, on the other hand, opposed giving up freedoms, compared to only 43 percent in favor.
  • Yet independents were the most resistant, with only 29 percent willing to sacrifice freedom, while 58 percent stood opposed.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/americans-fear-government-more-than-terror/#5qz9QhUtyJiPVzPd.99

Global Warming ‘gored’ by Russian Scientist as coldest spring ever undergone

This comes fresh on the heels of the new US Secretary of State John Kerry Telling the ChiComs that Man-Made Global Warming is the Number One Priority of the United States. You’ve got to be kidding, this hoax is our number one priority?

Kerry also issued a statement on Earth Day on Global Warming: 'The Science Is Screaming at All of Us and Demands Action'…We must deal "responsibly with the clear and present danger of climate change."

I still can’t get use to the fact that ‘winter soldier’ John Kerry is the Secretary of State!

An illegal alien communists as president and a ‘winter soldier’ as Secretary of State, you’d think someone was out to destroy the nation with people like that in the highest offices…

Second Coldest Start To Spring In History...

 

Russian Scientists: 'We Could Face Cooling Period For 200-250 Years'...

Friday, April 26, 2013

'HOMELAND' USING 1,000 MORE ROUNDS PER PERSON -- THAN ARMY?

WHY!

DHS was not created to protect the people of the homeland but to protect the government from the people of the homeland!

How long has government been our enemy? According to our founders it always has been. That’s the reason the Constitution and Bill of Rights sought to limit the power of government!

Government is like a chained beast, you loose the chains at your own peril. It’s like a fire, useful until you lose control of it and then it consumes you and all around you!

I’m positive our founders would be horrified at the power of the federal government today, more so than the government they separated from!


'HOMELAND' USING 1,000 MORE ROUNDS PER PERSON -- THAN ARMY?

Denies Ammunition Purchases Aimed at Civilians...

Senator Introduces Bill Limiting Federal Agencies From Stockpiling...

Factory Cannot Meet Customer Demand...

Obama praises Planned Parenthood abortion factories in the midst of the Gosnell infanticide trial

I wish we could go back, maybe we could wake people up to the fact that the United States is being systematically destroyed to set up the new world order.

We are being destroyed by the Republican and Democrat parties who are owned by the Luciferian Rothschild/Rockefeller bankster cabal.

OBAMA: ABORTION FOES WANT TO RETURN TO 1950S


Obama to Planned Parenthood: 'You're making me blush'...

First sitting president to address mega abortion provider...

'God Bless You'...

Who controls the GOP? The same cabal that controls the Democrats! Open your eyes!

Here is another example that the there is no difference in the goals of the Democrat and Republican party leadership. They know he’s a fraud but they protect him!

The supposed opposition leaders have done absolutely nothing to stop the destruction of the nation by the Obama administration.

Obama has obstinately defied federal judges rulings, refused to enforce US laws, spent us into a debt that can never be paid, issued executive orders undermining the constitution, supplied money and weapons to our enemies, given the Middle East to Muslim radicals, all the while sealing his past history tighter than Fort Knox!

And they’ve done absolutely nothing!  They do exactly as they are told by the Luciferian Rothschild/Rockefeller bankster cabal!

RINO Blocks Investigation of Obama’s Birth Certificate

April 25, 2013 @ NewsEditor

When I discovered Obama’s mother’s passport files posted on the Internet, I sent copies to Sen. Mitch McConnell and Sen. Lindsey Graham, explaining the passport problem and asking for an investigation. I also wrote a piece for the Western Center on Journalism, explaining the problem with Ann Dunham’s passport files. I had one simple question: If Obama was born in Hawaii, why wasn’t he included on his mother’s passport files? Passport regulations required a photo of parent and child and a copy of a hospital birth certificate.

I have a home in Louisville, KY, so I used my Kentucky address. My legal residence, however, is Arizona. I am concerned that someone in Congress apparently does not want any investigation into Obama’s eligibility to proceed.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been subjected to public ridicule for investigating Obama’s records since Congress refused. The American people want to know if their President is a citizen of the United States. That is not too much to ask.

I received a response from Sen. McConnell today that reads as follows:

When you contacted my office, you mentioned your concerns regarding President Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States. During the 2008 election season, President Obama released a copy of his birth certificate stating he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961. Since the election, several public officials — including Republican Governor Linda Lingle – have viewed and certified the original document. The consensus is clear that President Obama is a natural-born citizen.

Sen. McConnell specifically avoided any mention of the passport problem, obviously because he knows that whoever was altering or photoshopping records failed to look into his mother’s passport files.

I have a suggestion to make. Let’s make it a two-fer. Let’s get rid of Obama and his crony, Mitch McConnell, who has been stopping up the lawful investigation of Obama’s eligibility.

By Louise Hodges

Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore (Creative Commons)

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Seniors demoted to expendables

Obama got the ball rolling when he cut $700+ trillion from Medicare to “pay for Obamacare”. How would it make sense to do that unless he knew seniors wouldn’t be around to ‘waste’ the funds on,  having been deemed, in the words of Henry Kissinger, “useless eaters”! Ah, the DEATH PANELS...


FEEL THE PAIN: Meals on Wheels to drop seniors...

TBMC: Bloomberg eager to institute Police State

It could be just the way things evolve or it could be events planned and carried out in such a way as to bring about a one world government. In any event this brings us a whole lot closer!

The actual bombing was an alarming thing, some dead, many wounded, several severely, with a lot of blood  warranting the initial intense reaction.

But the hunt for the suspects after determining it was two young men, got a little Orwellian. They don’t normally shut down entire cities to chase down one seriously wounded perp, especially cities the size of Boston. This flies in the face of every TV show, every movie I’ve ever seen. The authorities always withhold or downplay things so as not to cause a panic.

But here, one wounded 19 year old is enough for the authorities to order the entire city to close and the citizens to remain indoors.

Look at the reaction of the citizens after it was over, lining the streets cheering the authorities as they withdrew from the scene. An army of police from different areas of responsibilities, local federal, and state agencies, the FBI (probably CIA too),  I couldn’t help but think of Hitler’s NAZI parades through the streets of Germany.

Now, because of this Boston Marathon Bombing, on the heels of surrendering more and more of our freedoms after 9/11 to the Patriot Act, DHS, NDAA, and so on, now the police have the freedom to lock down our cities/ communities/neighborhoods and order us out of our houses with the citizens cheering them on.

This whole thing (9/11 included) looks like a classic case of trauma based mind control (TBMC)…look it up!

Bloomberg: Interpretation of Constitution Will 'Have to Change' After Boston Bombing...



BOSTON WRONG: Residents Ordered Out Of Homes At Gunpoint By SWAT teams...


SHOCKING VIDEOS...

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Shock: Professor fired for requiring students to sign pledge to vote for Obama

Our schools have morphed into socialist indoctrination centers, how many just as egregious acts went on that weren’t reported or acted upon.

We should never have given our children to the feral government!

College fires professor who forced students to sign pledge to vote for Obama

By Oliver Darcy, on Apr 17, 2013

Brevard Community College (BCC) has fired a professor after a school investigation concluded she required students to sign a pledge to vote for President Obama in the run-up to the 2012 election.

Brevard Community College has fired Professor Sharon Sweet who forced her students to sign this pledge.

The school’s spokesman John Glisch, said the Board of Trustees voted Wednesday morning to terminate mathematics professor Sharon Sweet with an overwhelming vote.

“The board voted 3-1, with one member absent, to dismiss professor Sweet,” Glisch told Campus Reform Wednesday afternoon.

“The termination took effect immediately, ending pay and benefits for Sweet who had been suspended with pay under provisions of the United Faculty of Florida collective bargaining agreement with the college, pending the board’s decision,” the school added in a press release.

BCC was hurled into the national spotlight last year for Sweet’s actions after a Campus Reform exposé highlighted her alleged demand for students to support the Democratic Party in the 2012 elections.

The school’s president later recommended to the Board of Trustees that professor Sweet should be fired, following an investigation that found her guilty of “harassment, incompetence, misconduct, and unprofessional behavior.”

Sweet was a tenured professor who had taught at the college five years. She earned $40,000 annually.

Napolitano Drudge Report comment ignorant, stupid, or (a purposeful lie) psyops?

“I don’t know if I’d put Forbes and Drudge in the same sentence.” – Napolitano

The problem is, the article in question was on Forbes, Drudge just linked to it, how can she arrive at that conclusion? It wasn’t a Matt Drudge article, it was a Forbes article that Drudge linked to! Forbes is credible but Drudge is not credible because he linked to an article on it? How does that logic work?

Drudge is a news aggregate site, he just links to news around the web. He doesn’t write articles on it, he doesn’t editorialize on it, all he does is link to articles on other sites. And the sites are real, so how could she possibly deduce that the Drudge Report is not credible?

If she believes that she is either ignorant of the sites content, or stupid—how could a site that just links to other sites be not credible?

Or, it’s more likely psyops; she’s speaking to the low information voter and trying to discredit the site and giving her comrades in the media talking points they can use in their articles and on their TV shows for the low information voters.

You see, she knows the lamestream media is not going to report on an article like the one on Forbes and she doesn’t want people to see that article anywhere else and start to think—hey, what is DHS doing!

So she is out to discredit the Drudge Report…  

Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible

Charlie Spiering Commentary Staff Writer The Washington Examiner

During a House hearing this morning, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano criticized the Drudge Report for highlighting stories about the department’s purchases of ammunition and MRAP (mine-resistant, ambush protected) vehicles.
Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., questioned Napolitano about the reports from Forbes magazine and other stories linked on the Drudge Report.

“You know, when Forbes magazine or Drudge or some reputable news sources start to repeat the numbers … the numbers cease to become Internet rumors, and they start having some credibility,” Duncan said questioning the “long delay” from the DHS to clarify the numbers.

“I will tell you, we found it so inherently unbelievable that statements would be made, it was hard to ascribe credibility to them,” Napolitano said, suppressing a bemused smile, adding that, “I don’t know if I’d put Forbes and Drudge in the same sentence.”

Napolitano explained that the number of rounds reported seemed high because  it was an "up to number" and were purchased as part of a "five year strategic sourcing contract."

She reminded the audience that the DHS typically uses 150 to 160 million ammunition rounds a year.

Napolitano added that DHS didn't start refuting the reports until she started receiving congressional inquiries about the ammo purchases.

“If I might say in my own defense, we just couldn’t believe that anyone would believe those allegations, and so, let me be clear — absolutely not true,” Napolitano concluded.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

The insidious war on the 2nd amendment, this is how it manifest itself

This is idiotic, your kids are being brainwashed against guns every time one of them is suspended for drawing a picture of a gun, holding their hand in the shape of a gun, eating a desert into the shape of a gun, etc., etc., etc.

They'll have no trouble at all in a few short years taking your guns…

Texas Soldier Arrested for ‘Rudely Displaying’ Weapon

By  Charles C. W. Cooke

I just got off the phone with Army Master Sergeant. C. J. Grisham, a serving American soldier and veteran of the the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, who recently was illegally disarmed by the Temple Police Department while out for a walk with his son.

“We live out in the country in Texas, near Temple,” he told me. “My son and I were on a ten-mile hike so that he could earn his hiking merit badge – it’s the last badge he needs to become an Eagle Scout.” But half way into the hike, Grisham said, “a police officer pulled up.” Initially, he was “cordial” and he “asked what we were doing.” Grisham told him. “Then he looked at my rifle. I carry a rifle any time I walk around because there are feral hogs and cougars and things like that.” 

From here, things took a turn for the worse.

“‘Where you going with that rifle?’ he asked me. I said, ‘does it matter? Am I breaking any laws?’” Then, he says, the officer “grabbed the rifle without telling me – but it was attached to me. My immediate reaction as a combat veteran was to grab it back and then take a step back. I asked him what he was doing. So he pulled his gun on me. Then I thought about my son, so I put my hands off my gun and he told me to move over to the car. Luckily my son had the video camera to document the hike for his merit badge. I told him to turn it on.”

The video of the incident is below. I’d recommend you watch the whole thing. Note the officers’ ignorance of the rules they are there to uphold, the suggestion that the law doesn’t apply in this “day and age,” and the persistent claim that American citzens are presumed to have their weapons illegally unless otherwise demonstrated. Note the officer’s claim that merely owning a gun makes someone dangerous. Note the conflation of a soldier in a war zone with a citizen in rural Texas. Note the presistent refusal to explain what law Grisham has broken.

Particularly chilling is the officer’s telling Grisham that a police officer is “allowed to” carry a weapon, but that Grisham is not — despite Grisham’s having a permit. “We’re exempt from the law” is not a phrase you want to hear from law enforcement in a constitutional republic.

In an interview today, I asked Grisham why he thought the officer behaved in this way. “I don’t know,” he said “It’s not the law. You can’t go around taking guns without probable cause or a reasonable suspicion that someone is about to commit a crime. A lot of what the officers said is illegal, against Texas law, against national precedent, against Supreme Court decisions. I was legally exercising a right, especially in Texas where we have a right to carry weapons openly, and I have a concealed-carry permit. I wasn’t looking to make an issue out of it. I go up to Austin for Second Amendment rallies with my AR [rifle] all the time. But here in the country? Ultimately, it happened because I stood up to a police officer. I support the police. I’m on the public safety committee. But I also know that when I’m stopped by a police officer, I don’t have to say anything unless I’m accused of committing a crime. I’m not being a prick. I don’t think it was the gun initially, I think it was that my reaction hurt his ego.”

I suggest that this creates a Catch-22: If you comply, you’re giving up your rights; if you don’t, you’ll be punished. He agrees.

I ask what ”rudely displaying a firearm” means. ”There’s no such wording,” Grisham tells me. “I couldn’t find the word ‘rude’ in the penal code at all. You can openly carry a rifle as long as it’s not threatening. If it’s slung across your shoulder, it’s not threatening. When you point a gun at somebody then you’re breaking the law. But just walking around with a gun strapped in front of you is not threatening in any manner.”

What happens next? “I still don’t have my guns back and they took my concealed-carry license. I’m not accused of a gun crime, so there’s no reason for them to have my guns right now and the problem is that, what’s happened in the past with other soldiers is that the prosecutors will try and get the soldiers to agree to the police dropping the charges if they confiscate the gun — to have the charges dropped at the expense of their gun. This is a workaround loophole for gun confiscation.”

Does this happen to soldiers a lot? I ask. ”Yes, this has happened several times in this area. To Staff Sergeant Nate Samson, for example. He had to fight these guys for ten months. The charges were dropped, but he has no justice. He doesn’t have a lot of money to fight them. I have a pretrial hearing on May 29. The police are dragging their feet, not releasing the video. They’re waiting as long as they can — playing hard to get. . . . The reason I’m aggressive on this is that, in the military, if this happens, they initiate a flag that halts your career. You can’t take leave, you can’t be promoted, can’t receive awards or decorations. I am supposed to move to new base in July. I can’t do that. I’ve been on active duty for 18 and a half years and it’s got my career on a hold.”

I ask about his son. “I’ve tried to tell my son that this isn’t normal; that police officers don’t walk around doing this. He’s developed an unrealistic fear of police officers. We were bowling yesterday and he freaked out when a police officer walked in. He’s traumatized by the incident — seeing a gun pulled on his dad. I’m proud of him for his reaction. He’s doing well . . . we sit down and talk to our kids about the Constitution and guns and safety. My son can use every single weapon I have in the house from the AK-47 to .38 special.”

Is it particularly bad at the moment? ”I think so, yes. All the attention that the media and the politicians are giving to ‘assault weapons’ — I insist that none of my guns are ‘assault’ anything – is causing people to call and complain about seeing one. And instead of saying, ‘hey there’s nothing to be afraid of,’ they go out and hassle legal gun owners. Law enforcement have a duty to recognize that if someone is lawfully carrying a weapon then you should leave them alone. Who cares what somebody complains about?”

Monday, April 15, 2013

Maybe the media failed to cover the Gosnell because Barak Hussein Obama supports infanticide!

Help us stop this EVIL law: "Freedom of Choice Act," or FOCA!

Should have pushed the head back in, then it would have been ok?

10 of the Most Shocking Allegations in the Gruesome ‘House of Horrors’ That Was Dr. Kermit Gosnell’s Abortion Clinic (WARNING: Graphic)

Editor’s Note: This article deals with extremely-disturbing themes and subjects. Please be advised.

The details emerging from Dr. Kermit Gosnell’s murder trial are so gruesome that, based on the descriptions, one would assume they are fictional scenes from a horror movie. However, the reality is that the court case, which continues to expose the details of the alleged murders of at least seven babies, is, according to witness testimony, anything but a concocted tale.

TheBlaze first covered the case back in Jan. 2011, when we reported that Gosnell, 72, a Philadelphia-based abortion doctor, was charged with eight murders. Our coverage at the time, based on an AP report, provides just a brief overview of the horrific allegations:

A doctor who gave abortions to minorities, immigrants and poor women in a “house of horrors” clinic was charged with eight counts of murder in the deaths of a patient and seven babies who were born alive and then killed with scissors, prosecutors said Wednesday.

Dr. Kermit Gosnell…made millions of dollars over 30 years, performing as many illegal, late-term abortions as he could, prosecutors said. State regulators ignored complaints about him and failed to inspect his clinic since 1993, but no charges were warranted against them given time limits and existing law, District Attorney Seth Williams said. Nine of Gosnell’s employees also were charged.

Gosnell “induced labor, forced the live birth of viable babies in the sixth, seventh, eighth month of pregnancy and then killed those babies by cutting into the back of the neck with scissors and severing their spinal cord,” Williams said.

10 Shocking Alleged Details About Dr. Kermit Gosnells Abortion Clinic (WARNING: Graphic)

Dr. Kermit Gosnell (Photo Credit: AP)

The so-called “house of horrors” was discovered following drug-related complaints. It was in 2010 when the FBI first raided the facility after reports that painkillers were being improperly distributed. But rather than mere pill infractions, what authorities found was far more sinister.

When officials went in, the clinic’s conditions were unimaginable, with fetuses and severed feet reportedly stored without reason inside the establishment — and with blood splattered about. Considering these horrific conditions and the litany of additional details that have emerged since the case began, many are wondering why the media have been so silent on reporting what unfolded at Gosnell’s clinic.

Today, on Fox News, liberal commentator Kirsten Powers charged that there was no excuse for the media’s purported blackout on covering the abortion doctor’s horrific — and allegedly murderous — treatment of patients and their kin.

Considering that outlets generally love stories like this, Powers seemed dumbfounded as to why Gosnell’s purported crimes have gone somewhat unreported, as she noted that the general rule is “if it bleeds, it leads.”

“Whatever your position on abortion is, this is a story of interest to everyone,” she told Fox host Megyn Kelly. “This clinic had not been inspected in 17 years.”

10 Shocking Alleged Details About Dr. Kermit Gosnells Abortion Clinic (WARNING: Graphic)

The Women’s Medical Society (Photo Credit: AP)

Considering the lack of coverage (earlier today, we showed just how profound the dearth is), TheBlaze wants to offer readers a recap of some of the story’s most shocking — and important — details. In addition to allegations that Gosnell killed seven babies and one woman died on his watch, here are some of the key, must-know allegations:

1) Gosnell allegedly treated his minority clients with much less respect than his white patients. Considering that he was named, according to the AP, in more than 40 malpractice suits, the clinic head would purportedly perform abortions for caucasian women in cleaner locations (he assumed whites were more likely to complain about him).

2) In addition to the murderous allegations being waged against Gosnell, eight former employees of the clinic have pleaded guilty (some to third-degree murder) and have spoken in great lengths about the terrifying conditions at the clinic.

3) A 15-year-old girl allegedly helped facilitate abortions — including on potentially live babies — at the clinic. Ashley Baldwin, now 22, claims she worked nearly 50 hours per week. Even more shocking, she allegedly helped give women the drugs needed for the procedure — and apparently assisted throughout. Baldwin said that she saw aborted babies move on at least two occasions following abortions (in one instance, she said “the chest was moving”).

4) Gosnell purportedly used untrained and low-paid staff to conduct nearly 1,000 abortions each year. The charge for a procedure in the horrific conditions mentioned? Between $350 and several thousand, depending on how far along the pregnancy was. Prosecutors believe he made millions from the practice. Authorities claim the clinic brought in about $15,000 per day.

5) Speaking of “untrained,” prosecutors claim, according to the Gospel Coalition, that Gosnell is not certified to work in either gynecology or obstetrics.

6) In the grand jury report, the clinic was said to smell of animal urine and blood stains were on blankets and furniture inside of the office. Not surprisingly, sterilized instruments were unheard of inside the establishment. And somehow the state had failed to inspect — or even visit — the clinic since 1993.

7) In March, Adrienne Moton, a medical assistant at the clinic, provided sickening details about her alleged actions at the clinic, claiming that she snipped the spines of at least 10 babies; she said that another worker — and Gosnell himself — did the same. But that’s not the worst part. Moton also claimed that she once killed a baby after it was delivered in a toilet by cutting its neck with scissors. Moton plead guilty and has been in prison since 2011.

8) Another former employee, Sherry West, shared yet another horrifying story. She claims that she was once called to the back room at the clinic, where aborted babies’ bodies were apparently kept on a shelf. Once there, West heard a live baby among the bodies cry out. The screaming child “really freaked” her out, she told the court. “I can’t describe it. It sounded like a little alien,” she said, noting that she previously referred to the babies as “specimens,” because it was easier to mentally handle what was going on at the clinic.

9) Then there’s Robyn Reid’s story. She was only an 87-pound teen when she went to the clinic in 1998. Accompanied by her grandmother, she was looking for an abortion. But once she made it to the office, Reid changed her mind. But Salem-News.com writes that the doctor allegedly forced an abortion on her. ”Gosnell ripped off her clothes and restrained the girl. When she regained consciousness 12 hours later at her aunt’s home, she discovered that an abortion had been performed against her will,” the website reports.

10) “3801 Lancaster” is (warning: graphic) a documentary series that highlights the horror found at the clinic. Many of these claims, among others, are covered by the filmmakers.

TheBlaze will continue to explore this horrific story and will report accordingly as details unfold. You can read more about the clinic here.

'PANIC EVERYWHERE': Is this the beginning of the end?

GOLD PLUNGE...

'PANIC EVERYWHERE'...


Investors Bail Amid Collapse...

Worst two-day loss since 1983...

LIVE...


FOREIGN HOLDINGS OF US DEBT TO $5.7 TRILLION...

Saturday, April 13, 2013

We've forgotten what belongs on Page One, Lindsey Lohan’s drug problems yes, beheading babies no…

Rush Limbaugh calling a professed nymphomaniac a slut yes, severed baby feet in jars no…the lamestream media is still the mainstream media! And if they don’t report it, it’s as though it never happened for most of the world!

Philadelphia abortion clinic horror: Column

Kirsten Powers 8:49 p.m. EDT April 11, 2013

gosnell powers

Dr. Kermit Gosnell in March 2010 (Photo: Yong Kim, AP)
Story Highlights
  • Butchering babies that were already born and were older than the state's 24-week limit for abortions is the story.
  • That one is murder and the other is a legal procedure is morally irreconcilable.
  • This is not about being "pro-choice" or "pro-life." It is about basic human rights.

Infant beheadings. Severed baby feet in jars. A child screaming after it was delivered alive during an abortion procedure. Haven't heard about these sickening accusations?

It's not your fault. Since the murder trial of Pennsylvania abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell began March 18, there has been precious little coverage of the case that should be on every news show and front page. The revolting revelations of Gosnell's former staff, who have been testifying to what they witnessed and did during late-term abortions, should shock anyone with a heart.

NBC-10 Philadelphia reported that, Stephen Massof, a former Gosnell worker, "described how he snipped the spinal cords of babies, calling it, 'literally a beheading. It is separating the brain from the body." One former worker, Adrienne Moton, testified that Gosnell taught her his "snipping" technique to use on infants born alive.

Massof, who, like other witnesses, has himself pleaded guilty to serious crimes, testified "It would rain fetuses. Fetuses and blood all over the place." Here is the headline the Associated Press put on a story about his testimony that he saw 100 babies born and then snipped: "Staffer describes chaos at PA abortion clinic."

"Chaos" isn't really the story here. Butchering babies that were already born and were older than the state's 24-week limit for abortions is the story. There is a reason the late Democratic senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan called this procedure infanticide.

Planned Parenthood recently claimed that the possibility of infants surviving late-term abortions was "highly unusual." The Gosnell case suggests otherwise.

Regardless of such quibbles, about whether Gosnell was killing the infants one second after they left the womb instead of partially inside or completely inside the womb — as in a routine late-term abortion — is merely a matter of geography. That one is murder and the other is a legal procedure is morally irreconcilable.

A Lexis-Nexis search shows none of the news shows on the three major national television networks has mentioned the Gosnell trial in the last three months. The exception is when Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan hijacked a segment on Meet the Press meant to foment outrage over an anti-abortion rights law in some backward red state.

The Washington Post has not published original reporting on this during the trial and The New York Times saw fit to run one original story on A-17 on the trial's first day. They've been silent ever since, despite headline-worthy testimony.

Let me state the obvious. This should be front page news. When Rush Limbaugh attacked Sandra Fluke, there was non-stop media hysteria. The venerable NBC Nightly News' Brian Williams intoned, "A firestorm of outrage from women after a crude tirade from Rush Limbaugh," as he teased a segment on the brouhaha. Yet, accusations of babies having their heads severed — a major human rights story if there ever was one — doesn't make the cut.

You don't have to oppose abortion rights to find late-term abortion abhorrent or to find the Gosnell trial eminently newsworthy. This is not about being "pro-choice" or "pro-life." It's about basic human rights.

The deafening silence of too much of the media, once a force for justice in America, is a disgrace.

Friday, April 12, 2013

No sequester for UN funding, Obama positioning himself for next UN Secretary General?

Why does UN funding escape sequester cuts? The press wouldn’t be able to find folks affected by it so, no political gain!

He can’t run for president again, constitutionally, although that hasn’t stopped him from doing other things, so is he after the UN’s top spot? He wants to be king of the world?

There is not that much prestige accrued to the UN Secretary General at present but no doubt, the Grand Malignant Narcissists would change that.

Despite sequester, State Department ups support for the UN

By George Russell Published April 12, 2013 FoxNews.com

Even as the mandated sequester bites into U.S. federal spending -- and newly appointed Secretary of State John Kerry boasts that he is cutting his budget by 6 percent -- the State Department is planning to boost spending on the United Nations in 2014 by more than 4 percent to at least $3.6 billion.

That is likely to be far from the final tally of Obama Administration support, as hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. development, health and other funds are usually channeled through U.N. agencies and institutions -- with the U.N. agencies taking administrative fees as part of the deal. The most recent tally on the website of the White House Management and Budget website, for example, lists support for the U.N. at $7.7 billion -- in 2010.

Nonetheless, the portions that are sprinkled across various areas of  State’s 2014 budget—which, like the rest of the administration’s proposed budget, must still face Congressional approval-- are impressive, at least in terms of their hikes over previous years.  

The projected spending increase for the New York-based U.N. Secretariat, for example, is an 8.6 percent hike, to $617.6 million, compared with 2013. It represents the U.S.’ 22 percent annual share –the highest by far of any country--of the Secretariat’s “regular” budget covered by dues levied on richer member states.

When a broader array of U.N. affiliated agencies, listed under “Contributions to International Organizations,” are added in to the Secretariat support, the U.S. planned contribution climbs to $1.2 billion -- a still significant 4.5 percent hike in an age of enforced American domestic austerity.

Meantime, proposed U.S. contributions to U.N. peacekeeping are also taking a big  hike, to $2.09 billion, up more than a quarter-billion dollars, or 13.9 percent, from 2013, and an even more impressive 14.6 percent since 2012.

One reason: there has been an increase this year in the annual share of global peacekeeping expenses that the U.S. bears, from 27.14 percent to 28.36 percent, even as a number of peacekeeping missions close or shrink.

But there have also been expanded, and unexpected, increases in U.N. forces in Libya, Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Somalia, to name a few. The State Department budget also contains, among other things, an optimistic $50 million item to support a “U.N. presence in Syria.”

Even those total big-ticket categories, of course, vastly understate the amount of money that the U.S.. showers on the U.N. each year, which includes food aid, health and humanitarian assistance that are channeled through U.N. agencies, which claim administrative fees for handling the aid -- though often not especially well.

Just as important as the overall amount, however, are the Administration's priorities, in a $47.8 billion budget that Secretary of State Kerry, in an 8-page introductory letter, calls “a reflection of priorities and hard choices in a difficult fiscal environment.” (Interestingly enough, the term “United Nations” does not occur even once in the letter.)

This time, even some of the much smaller priority streams of U.S. funding through U.N. channels may prove controversial.

Among them: an Administration renewal of its campaign to give about $77.8 million next year to the U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, or UNESCO, an annual contribution that Congress cut off in late 2011 when the organization gave full member-state status to Palestine over strong U.S. objections. The State Department tried to restore the money in 2012, but failed.

This time, in fact, the Administration hopes to give far more money to UNESCO even than the budget openly advertises.

Buried in a footnote to the 190-page State Department is the news that if the Administration can coax Congress into granting a waiver to the freeze, State hopes to hand over the money it did not provide in 2012 and 2013, which could amount to another $135 million.

Both the main UNESCO contribution and the largesse in the footnote are  bad ideas, according to those who argue that such concessions as the UNESCO recognition help to keep Palestinians from seriously joining the bargaining table with Israel to achieve a lasting Middle East peace settlement.

“The only reason that Palestine has not extended its push for recognition with other U.N. organization is the threat of the loss of U.S. funding,” says Brett Schaefer, an expert on U.N. finances at the conservative Heritage Foundation. “If congress gives in to State’s budget request, we would be giving a signal for just such a diplomatic offensive.”

Other small elements of the State Department’s proposed U.N. tally may also evoke outsized controversy.

State Department contributions to “International Organizations and Programs” include a 30 percent hike, to $13 million, for the U.N.-sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), whose assessments of global warming have been sharply criticized by skeptics.

Secretary of State Kerry is, if anything, more fervent than President Obama himself in his support of urgent—and expensive—action to combat “climate change.” As he puts it grandly in his introductory budget letter, “We must have the foresight and courage to make the investments necessary to safeguard the most sacred trust for our children and grandchildren: an environment not ravaged by rising seas, deadly superstorms, devastating droughts, and the other hallmarks of a dramatically changing climate.”

Another proposed budget increase that may spark controversy is a 22.5 percent hike in financing, to $37 million, for the U.N. Population Fund, whose espousal of abortion has drawn fire from the right-to-life movement.

On the other hand, not every line item in the State Department’s request is a bigger number than the previous year.

The $5.7 billion United Nations Development Program, for example, which has been chided by its own internal evaluators as not especially good at relieving poverty, comes in for an 18 percent cut in funding, to $67 million (the number, however, does not include U.S. anti-poverty and development aid channeled through the organization).

George Russell is editor-at-large of Fox News and can be found on Twitter @GeorgeRussell.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/04/12/despite-sequester-state-department-ups-support-for-un/#ixzz2QHpa1t5b

John Kerry's Department of State, mind numbing. How can this be?

I was hoping the hippy generation would grow up, i. e., mature, they didn’t , instead they grew up and got into politics!

John Kerry, secretary of state, what a travesty!

Diane M. George shared The Kitchen Cabinet's photo.

Wow, John Kerry's Department of State doesn't seem to be able to keep a story straight any better than Hillary's could...

State Department employee Anne Smedinghoff was killed last weekend and the "story" was that she had been with a convoy that was hit by a roadside bomb, and that was the story told to her parents. Today, The Weekly Standard brings to our attention that this probably is not how it happened.

... "At first reports suggested the young diplomat was part of an armed convoy that was bombed, but new reports say that she was actually on foot. And that the group she was with got lost on its way to deliver books."

They had a military escort, and were only a few steps away from the safety of the base when the car bomb went off and killed them.

"Abed’s account of the bombing, the most detailed to surface since the explosion, raises new questions about the circumstances that led to the deadliest combat incident in Afghanistan for Americans this year and contradicts what relatives of the victims have said they were told – that Smedinghoff and her military escorts had been in an armored vehicle when it was rammed by a suicide vehicle. Smedinghoff was the first American diplomat to die in Afghanistan during more than 11 years of warfare here."

WE're not implying conspiracy here... we just want to understand why the State Department can't seem to get their stories accurate when they have to bring terrible news to family members of slain State personnel.

More: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/story-state-dept-employees-death-afghanistan-changes_716284.html